A. M. Cool

1.8k total citations
39 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

A. M. Cool is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, A. M. Cool has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13 papers in Instrumentation and 3 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in A. M. Cool's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (31 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (19 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (16 papers). A. M. Cool is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (31 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (19 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (16 papers). A. M. Cool collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. A. M. Cool's co-authors include Ivan R. King, J. E. Grindlay, H. N. Cohn, P. M. Lugger, G. Piotto, Jay Anderson, C. O. Heinke, P. D. Edmonds, L. R. Bedin and Andrea Bellini and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astronomical Journal.

In The Last Decade

A. M. Cool

38 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. M. Cool United States 18 1.0k 344 90 72 39 39 1.1k
Jiřı́ Krtička Czechia 23 1.4k 1.4× 393 1.1× 56 0.6× 35 0.5× 24 0.6× 110 1.5k
B. Klein United States 12 1.0k 1.0× 190 0.6× 164 1.8× 69 1.0× 62 1.6× 22 1.1k
M. Still United States 19 913 0.9× 183 0.5× 138 1.5× 89 1.2× 22 0.6× 50 926
A. Kawka Australia 20 1.1k 1.1× 338 1.0× 80 0.9× 64 0.9× 46 1.2× 58 1.2k
C. De Loore Belgium 18 861 0.8× 219 0.6× 70 0.8× 52 0.7× 24 0.6× 64 913
G. Vauclair France 19 902 0.9× 378 1.1× 48 0.5× 49 0.7× 43 1.1× 79 921
A. Damineli Brazil 24 1.7k 1.6× 219 0.6× 118 1.3× 48 0.7× 42 1.1× 79 1.7k
W. Krzemiński United States 17 880 0.8× 233 0.7× 154 1.7× 33 0.5× 45 1.2× 41 908
D. Vanbeveren Belgium 16 1.1k 1.1× 297 0.9× 109 1.2× 19 0.3× 22 0.6× 72 1.2k
Adrian S. Hamers United States 23 1.3k 1.3× 174 0.5× 59 0.7× 48 0.7× 30 0.8× 47 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by A. M. Cool

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. M. Cool's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. M. Cool with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. M. Cool more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. M. Cool

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. M. Cool. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. M. Cool. The network helps show where A. M. Cool may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. M. Cool

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. M. Cool. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. M. Cool based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. M. Cool. A. M. Cool is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cohn, H. N., P. M. Lugger, Yue Zhao, et al.. (2021). A deep search for faint Chandra X-ray sources, radio sources, and optical counterparts in NGC 6752. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 508(2). 2823–2847. 8 indexed citations
2.
Milone, A. P., Enrico Vesperini, A. F. Marino, et al.. (2019). The Hubble Space Telescope UV Legacy Survey of Galactic globular clusters – XXI. Binaries among multiple stellar populations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 492(4). 5457–5469. 17 indexed citations
3.
Cool, A. M., et al.. (2018). A Deep X-ray Survey of the globular cluster Omega Centauri. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 479(2). 2834–2852. 26 indexed citations
4.
Sandoval, L. E. Rivera, M. van den Berg, C. O. Heinke, et al.. (2018). New cataclysmic variables and other exotic binaries in the globular cluster 47 Tucanae*. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 475(4). 4841–4867. 32 indexed citations
5.
Zhao, Yue, et al.. (2018). Identifications of faintChandrasources in the globular cluster M3. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 483(4). 4560–4577. 8 indexed citations
6.
Bellini, Andrea, Jay Anderson, L. R. Bedin, et al.. (2017). The State-of-the-art HST Astro-photometric Analysis of the Core of ω Centauri. I. The Catalog. The Astrophysical Journal. 842(1). 6–6. 93 indexed citations
7.
Sandoval, L. E. Rivera, M. van den Berg, C. O. Heinke, et al.. (2015). Discovery of near-ultraviolet counterparts to millisecond pulsars in the globular cluster 47 Tucanae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 453(3). 2708–2718. 17 indexed citations
8.
Haggard, Daryl, A. M. Cool, C. O. Heinke, et al.. (2014). A Deep Chandra X-Ray Limit on the Putative IMBH in Omega Centauri. 2014. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hourihane, A., P. J. Callanan, A. M. Cool, & M. T. Reynolds. (2011). Ground- and space-based study of two globular cluster cataclysmic variables: M22 CV1 and M5 V101. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 414(1). 184–194. 4 indexed citations
10.
Cool, A. M., et al.. (2007). Two White Dwarf Populations in the Globular Cluster NGC 6397. 210.
11.
Heinke, C. O., J. E. Grindlay, P. M. Lugger, et al.. (2003). Analysis of the Quiescent Low‐Mass X‐Ray Binary Population in Galactic Globular Clusters. The Astrophysical Journal. 598(1). 501–515. 99 indexed citations
12.
Edmonds, P. D., J. E. Grindlay, A. M. Cool, et al.. (1999). Cataclysmic Variables and a Candidate Helium White Dwarf in the Globular Cluster NGC 6397. The Astrophysical Journal. 516(1). 250–262. 42 indexed citations
13.
Cool, A. M.. (1998). Measuring Globular Cluster Mass Functions with HST. 142. 139. 1 indexed citations
14.
Grindlay, J. E. & A. M. Cool. (1996). HST/FOS Discovery of Probable CVS in NGC 6397. Symposium - International Astronomical Union. 174. 349–350. 1 indexed citations
15.
Piotto, G., A. M. Cool, & Ivan R. King. (1996). Stellar Luminosity and Mass Functions of Globular Clusters. Symposium - International Astronomical Union. 174. 71–80. 3 indexed citations
16.
King, Ivan R., et al.. (1995). Mass Segregation in the Globular Cluster NGC 6397. The Astrophysical Journal. 452(1). 25 indexed citations
17.
Cool, A. M., et al.. (1995). Discovery of candidate cataclysmic variables in the post-core-collapse globular cluster NGC 6397. The Astrophysical Journal. 439. 695–695. 44 indexed citations
18.
Grindlay, J. E., A. M. Cool, P. J. Callanan, et al.. (1995). Spectroscopic Identification of Probable Cataclysmic Variables in the Globular Cluster NGC 6397. The Astrophysical Journal. 455(1). 50 indexed citations
19.
Cool, A. M., J. E. Grindlay, M. Krockenberger, & C. D. Bailyn. (1993). Discovery of multiple low-luminosity X-ray sources in NGC 6397. The Astrophysical Journal. 410. L103–L103. 13 indexed citations
20.
Grindlay, J. E., A. M. Cool, & C. D. Bailyn. (1991). CVs and millisecond pulsar progenitors in globular clusters. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 13. 396. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026