A. J. Bracken

2.5k total citations
101 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

A. J. Bracken is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Geometry and Topology. According to data from OpenAlex, A. J. Bracken has authored 101 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 33 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 21 papers in Geometry and Topology. Recurrent topics in A. J. Bracken's work include Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (21 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (20 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (18 papers). A. J. Bracken is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (21 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (20 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (18 papers). A. J. Bracken collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Greece. A. J. Bracken's co-authors include M. D. Gould, A. O. Barut, R. B. Zhang, L. Bass, Yao-Zhong Zhang, Peter Robinson, Jon Links, Demosthenes Ellinas, H. S. Green and Gustav W. Delius and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

A. J. Bracken

94 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. J. Bracken Australia	22	682	633	600	450	262	101	1.7k
J. Van der Jeugt Belgium	18	334 0.5×	633 1.0×	502 0.8×	544 1.2×	72 0.3×	136	1.2k
Daniel Kastler France	20	899 1.3×	301 0.5×	766 1.3×	480 1.1×	234 0.9×	53	2.3k
S. N. M. Ruijsenaars Netherlands	22	689 1.0×	930 1.5×	1.3k 2.2×	395 0.9×	62 0.2×	79	2.1k
José M. Gracia-Bondı́a Spain	19	359 0.5×	364 0.6×	741 1.2×	380 0.8×	131 0.5×	48	1.4k
Detlev Buchholz Germany	23	815 1.2×	317 0.5×	643 1.1×	284 0.6×	120 0.5×	83	1.7k
Mo‐Lin Ge China	23	954 1.4×	729 1.2×	593 1.0×	324 0.7×	565 2.2×	204	1.7k
A. U. Klimyk Ukraine	17	410 0.6×	995 1.6×	793 1.3×	742 1.6×	85 0.3×	81	2.0k
Cosmas Zachos United States	25	851 1.2×	877 1.4×	1.4k 2.4×	480 1.1×	230 0.9×	72	2.7k
F. A. Berezin Russia	15	742 1.1×	525 0.8×	867 1.4×	369 0.8×	149 0.6×	33	2.3k
Joseph C. Várilly Costa Rica	16	330 0.5×	317 0.5×	656 1.1×	359 0.8×	126 0.5×	37	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by A. J. Bracken

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. J. Bracken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. J. Bracken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. J. Bracken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. J. Bracken

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. J. Bracken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. J. Bracken. The network helps show where A. J. Bracken may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. J. Bracken

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. J. Bracken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. J. Bracken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. J. Bracken. A. J. Bracken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bracken, A. J., et al.. (2023). Comment on ‘Backflow in relativistic wave equations’. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical. 56(13). 138002–138002. 3 indexed citations

Bracken, A. J.. (2021). Probability flow for a free particle: new quantum effects. Physica Scripta. 96(4). 45201–45201. 12 indexed citations

Bracken, A. J. & L. Bass. (2016). Differential Equations of Electrodiffusion. arXiv (Cornell University). 76(6). 2286–2305.

Anissimov, Yuri G., A. J. Bracken, & Michael S. Roberts. (2002). Catheter Effects in Organ Perfusion Experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 214(2). 263–273. 2 indexed citations

Bracken, A. J., et al.. (1999). XIIth International Congress of Mathematical Physics : ICMP '97 : Department of mathematics the university of Queensland Brisbane, 13-19 July, 1997.

Anissimov, Yuri G., A. J. Bracken, & Michael S. Roberts. (1999). Interconnected-Tubes Model of Hepatic Elimination: Steady-state Considerations. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 199(4). 435–447. 4 indexed citations

Bracken, A. J., Xiangyu Ge, Yao-Zhong Zhang, & Huan-Qiang Zhou. (1999). Boundary two-parameter eight-state supersymmetric fermion model and Bethe ansatz solution. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society. 59(3). 375–390.

Anissimov, Yuri G., A. J. Bracken, & Michael S. Roberts. (1997). Interconnected-tubes Model of Hepatic Elimination. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 188(1). 89–101. 22 indexed citations

Bracken, A. J., M. D. Gould, & Yao-Zhong Zhang. (1995). Quantised affine algebras and parameter-dependent R-matrices. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society. 51(2). 177–194. 14 indexed citations

10.

Bracken, A. J., M. D. Gould, Jon Links, & Yao-Zhong Zhang. (1995). New Supersymmetric and Exactly Solvable Model of Correlated Electrons. Physical Review Letters. 74(14). 2768–2771. 93 indexed citations

11.

Gould, M. D., et al.. (1993). QUANTUM SUPERGROUPS AND LINK POLYNOMIALS. Reviews in Mathematical Physics. 5(3). 533–549. 9 indexed citations

12.

Gould, M. D., Jon Links, & A. J. Bracken. (1992). Matrix elements and Wigner coefficients for U q[gl(n)]. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 33(3). 1008–1022. 10 indexed citations

13.

Bracken, A. J. & Henry C. Tuckwell. (1992). Simple mathematical models for urban growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 438(1902). 171–181. 5 indexed citations

14.

Gould, M. D., et al.. (1991). Generalized Gelfand invariants of quantum groups. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 24(5). 937–943. 11 indexed citations

15.

Zhang, R. B., M. D. Gould, & A. J. Bracken. (1991). Solutions of the graded classical Yang-Baxter equation and integrable models. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 24(6). 1185–1197. 25 indexed citations

16.

Bracken, A. J., et al.. (1991). Harmonic functions satisfying a radiation boundary condition. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 22(2). 23–38. 2 indexed citations

17.

Bracken, A. J., et al.. (1990). Quasiclassical states of the Coulomb system and so(4, 2). Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 23(11). 2027–2047. 9 indexed citations

18.

Bass, L. & A. J. Bracken. (1983). The flux-ratio equation under nonstationary boundary conditions. Mathematical Biosciences. 66(1). 87–92. 11 indexed citations

19.

Bracken, A. J.. (1975). Commutation and anti-commutation relations for a class of Gel'fand-Yaglom matrices. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 8(5). 800–807. 4 indexed citations

20.

Bracken, A. J., et al.. (1973). Parastatistics and the quark model. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 14(12). 1784–1793. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact