A. H. Smith

429 citations
13 papers · 73 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

A. H. Smith

10 papers receiving 37 citations

Peers

A. H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Classics 14
  • Language and Linguistics 18
  • Space and Planetary Science 2
  • History 14
  • Archeology 10
Replace F. M. Stenton with:
F. M. Stenton
Lucien Musset
Bede
Nora K. Chadwick
Alfred Rahlfs
George Vernadsky United States
Nicole Oresme
Charles Higounet France
Barbara Aland
Alain Dierkens Belgium
A. H. Smith relative to F. M. Stenton F. M. Stenton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
F. M. Stenton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. H. Smith. The network helps show where A. H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside A. H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. H. Smith Line = papers co-authored together A. H. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 196320
2 196518
3
The place-names of Westmorland
196710
4 19575
5 19584
6
Imposing Injustice: The Prospect of Mandatory Arbitration for Guestworkers
20143
7 20103
8
A Catalogue of Sculpture in the Department of Greek and Roman Antiquities, British Museum
20093
9
The Underprosecution of Labor Trafficking
20192
10 19582
11
Citation Counts [Letter to the Editor]
19881
12
A Catalogue Of Sculptures By The Successors Of Pheidias: In The British Museum
20091
13
The teaching of English
19751

About A. H. Smith

A. H. Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, Political Science and International Relations, Classics and Anthropology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 73 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (3 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (2 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (2 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (14 citations), Language and Linguistics (18 citations), Space and Planetary Science (2 citations), History (14 citations) and Archeology (10 citations). A. H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth M. Cameron, F. V. Emery, H. C. Darby, Karl Brünner and Randolph Quirk. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Journal, The Modern Language Review, Canadian Theatre Review, SSRN Electronic Journal and Modern Language Notes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact