A. G. Foote

991 total citations
28 papers, 835 citations indexed

About

A. G. Foote is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Forestry and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, A. G. Foote has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 835 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 17 papers in Forestry and 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in A. G. Foote's work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (12 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (12 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (11 papers). A. G. Foote is often cited by papers focused on Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (12 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (12 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (11 papers). A. G. Foote collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Ghana and South Africa. A. G. Foote's co-authors include G. B. Douglas, G. C. Waghorn, R. W. Purchas, T. N. Barry, Grant Douglas, G. F. Wilson, T. N. Barry, Thomas H Terrill, Peter Kemp and J.H. Niezen and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Agricultural Science, Agroforestry Systems and New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research.

In The Last Decade

A. G. Foote

26 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. G. Foote New Zealand 14 593 258 190 140 134 28 835
S. A. Abdulrazak Kenya 18 540 0.9× 241 0.9× 174 0.9× 142 1.0× 146 1.1× 57 957
James M. Fedders United States 14 365 0.6× 152 0.6× 185 1.0× 267 1.9× 98 0.7× 37 740
Waghorn Gc 16 750 1.3× 151 0.6× 92 0.5× 117 0.8× 164 1.2× 31 876
Carlos A. Ramírez-Restrepo Australia 17 673 1.1× 210 0.8× 133 0.7× 144 1.0× 179 1.3× 38 923
Simon J. Duncan New Zealand 13 552 0.9× 131 0.5× 248 1.3× 98 0.7× 325 2.4× 25 976
K. P. Coffey United States 16 518 0.9× 110 0.4× 93 0.5× 182 1.3× 145 1.1× 88 823
G.P. Cosgrove New Zealand 17 632 1.1× 208 0.8× 103 0.5× 165 1.2× 207 1.5× 72 985
K. A. Cassida United States 17 664 1.1× 93 0.4× 193 1.0× 79 0.6× 136 1.0× 51 918
Racheal H. Bryant New Zealand 16 718 1.2× 267 1.0× 153 0.8× 101 0.7× 125 0.9× 82 981
E. K. Okine Canada 17 680 1.1× 89 0.3× 133 0.7× 74 0.5× 175 1.3× 38 891

Countries citing papers authored by A. G. Foote

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. G. Foote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. G. Foote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. G. Foote more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. G. Foote

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. G. Foote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. G. Foote. The network helps show where A. G. Foote may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. G. Foote

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. G. Foote. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. G. Foote based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. G. Foote. A. G. Foote is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rumball, W., R. B. Claydon, & A. G. Foote. (2008). ‘GFT188’ 5‐leaflet red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(3). 269–270. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rumball, W. & A. G. Foote. (2008). Ryegrass ( Lolium spp.) selections with branched inflorescences. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(3). 265–267. 2 indexed citations
3.
Douglas, Grant, A. S. Walcroft, Jane Potter, et al.. (2006). Interactions between Widely Spaced Young Poplars (Populus spp.) and the Understorey Environment. Agroforestry Systems. 67(2). 177–186. 18 indexed citations
4.
Snow, Val, et al.. (2003). Coppiced hardwood trees for reuse of farm dairy effluent. NZGA Research and Practice Series. 10. 73–83. 1 indexed citations
5.
Douglas, Grant, et al.. (2003). Willow coppice and browse blocks: establishment and management. NZGA Research and Practice Series. 10. 41–51. 7 indexed citations
6.
Oppong, Samuel, Peter Kemp, Grant Douglas, & A. G. Foote. (2002). Effects of season and frequency of harvest on browse yield and root carbohydrate reserves of willows ( Salix spp.) in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 45(2). 87–95. 10 indexed citations
7.
Oppong, Samuel, Peter Kemp, Grant Douglas, & A. G. Foote. (2001). Browse yield and nutritive value of two Salix species and Dorycnium rectum in New Zealand. Agroforestry Systems. 51(1). 11–21. 25 indexed citations
8.
9.
Waghorn, G. C., G. B. Douglas, J.H. Niezen, Warren C. McNabb, & A. G. Foote. (1998). Forages with condensed tannins - their management and nutritive value for ruminants. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 89–98. 47 indexed citations
10.
Douglas, Grant, et al.. (1996). Cutting management of willows ( Salix spp.) and leguminous shrubs for forage during summer. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(2). 175–184. 47 indexed citations
11.
Douglas, G. B., et al.. (1996). Effect of condensed tannins upon the performance of lambs grazing Lotus corniculatus and lucerne (Medicago sativa). The Journal of Agricultural Science. 126(1). 87–98. 129 indexed citations
12.
Douglas, G. B., et al.. (1996). Effect of condensed tannins inLotus corniculatusupon lactation performance in ewes. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 126(3). 353–362. 139 indexed citations
13.
Douglas, G. B., G. C. Waghorn, T. N. Barry, et al.. (1995). Liveweight gain and wool production of sheep grazing Lotus corniculatus and lucerne ( Medicago sativa ). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 38(1). 95–104. 66 indexed citations
14.
Douglas, G. B. & A. G. Foote. (1994). Establishment of perennial species useful for soil conservation and as forages. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 37(1). 1–9. 20 indexed citations
15.
Douglas, G. B. & A. G. Foote. (1993). Growth of sheep's burnet and two dryland legumes under periodic mob‐stocking with sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 36(4). 393–397. 4 indexed citations
16.
Hare, Michael D., et al.. (1993). Herbicide tolerance of Grasslands Puna chicory. Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference. 46. 282–287. 5 indexed citations
17.
Lambert, M. G., Noel A. Trustrum, D. A. Costall, & A. G. Foote. (1993). Revegetation of erosion scars in Wairarapa hill country. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 177–181. 12 indexed citations
18.
Foote, A. G., et al.. (1989). DORYCNIUM SPECIES - TWO NEW LEGUMES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DRYLAND PASTURE REJUVENATION AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION IN NEW ZEALAND. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 169–174. 20 indexed citations
19.
Douglas, G. B. & A. G. Foote. (1985). Dry matter and seed yields of sulla ( Hedysarum coronarium L.). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 13(1). 97–99. 9 indexed citations
20.
Douglas, G. B. & A. G. Foote. (1985). Performance of several annual legumes which have potential for soil conservation. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 13(1). 13–17. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026