A. de Wit

22 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

A. de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Public Administration 26
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
  • Health 46
  • Sociology and Political Science 191
  • Safety Research 36
Replace Valerie Egdell with:
Valerie Egdell United Kingdom
Lionel Prouteau France
Wendy Smits Belgium
Jiří Večerník Czechia
Ugo Ascoli Italy
P. Y. Martin United States
Jo Anne Schneider United States
Michael Tåhlin Sweden
Marge Unt Estonia
John Goodwin United Kingdom
A. de Wit relative to Valerie Egdell United Kingdom Valerie Egdell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Valerie Egdell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. de Wit. The network helps show where A. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside A. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. de Wit Line = papers co-authored together A. de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201675
2 201849
3 201542
4 201742
5 201715
6 202213
7 201613
8 202012
9 202111
10 20106
11 20235
12 20204
13 20214
14
Welfare impacts of participation. Deliverable 3.3 of the project: “Impact of the Third Sector as Social Innovation” (ITSSOIN)
20153
15 20232
16 20161
17
Kosten-effectiviteit en implementatie: De theorie van economische evaluatie versus de public health-praktijk
20061
18 20111
19 20251
20 20161

About A. de Wit

A. de Wit is a scholar working on Finance, Safety Research, Health, General Social Sciences and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (9 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers), Social Capital and Networks (4 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (3 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers) and Youth Development and Social Support (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (26 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations), Health (46 citations), Sociology and Political Science (191 citations) and Safety Research (36 citations). A. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include René Bekkers, Femida Handy, Pamala Wiepking, M.I. Broese Van Groenou, Michaela Neumayr, Terry van Dijk, Ji Ma, Noëlle Aarts, Albertine J. Schuit and Mariëtte Huizinga. Their work appears in journals such as Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, European Sociological Review, VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026