A. de Wit

610 total citations
24 papers, 303 citations indexed

About

A. de Wit is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, A. de Wit has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 303 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Education and 4 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in A. de Wit's work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (9 papers), Social Capital and Networks (4 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers). A. de Wit is often cited by papers focused on Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (9 papers), Social Capital and Networks (4 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers). A. de Wit collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. A. de Wit's co-authors include René Bekkers, Femida Handy, Pamala Wiepking, M.I. Broese Van Groenou, Michaela Neumayr, Noëlle Aarts, Terry van Dijk, Ji Ma, Mariëtte Huizinga and Albertine J. Schuit and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Computers & Education and Public Administration Review.

In The Last Decade

A. de Wit

22 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. de Wit Netherlands	9	191	50	46	36	33	24	303
Lionel Prouteau France	11	281 1.5×	27 0.5×	39 0.8×	24 0.7×	74 2.2×	28	384
Michaela Neumayr Austria	9	201 1.1×	31 0.6×	21 0.5×	17 0.5×	15 0.5×	17	272
Anne Laure Humbert United Kingdom	13	169 0.9×	25 0.5×	36 0.8×	15 0.4×	31 0.9×	40	511
Ann E. Kaplan United States	5	185 1.0×	34 0.7×	27 0.6×	33 0.9×	12 0.4×	6	270
Hyojin Kang United States	5	195 1.0×	28 0.6×	47 1.0×	36 1.0×	33 1.0×	5	335
Bronwen Dalton Australia	12	271 1.4×	20 0.4×	16 0.3×	24 0.7×	45 1.4×	48	431
Fany Yuval Israel	12	178 0.9×	53 1.1×	14 0.3×	15 0.4×	23 0.7×	30	344
Matthew Gray Australia	12	271 1.4×	35 0.7×	32 0.7×	18 0.5×	46 1.4×	44	414
Louise Humpage New Zealand	11	157 0.8×	27 0.5×	61 1.3×	39 1.1×	104 3.2×	51	385

Countries citing papers authored by A. de Wit

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. de Wit

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. de Wit. The network helps show where A. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. de Wit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. de Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. de Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. de Wit. A. de Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Merz, Eva‐Maria, et al.. (2025). Increasing knowledge about plasma and plasma donation through a serious game: Evidence from a mixed-method study. Computers & Education. 233. 105325–105325.

Wit, A. de, et al.. (2025). Motivating Business Students for Civic Education: Design Principles for Aligning Civic Engagement Programs with Student Motivation. Journal of Business Ethics. 203(4). 751–768. 1 indexed citations

Wiepking, Pamala & A. de Wit. (2023). Unrestricted funding and nonprofit capacities: Developing a conceptual model. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 34(4). 801–824. 5 indexed citations

Bekkers, René, et al.. (2023). Civic-mindedness and discipline selection: do civically-minded students cluster within disciplines?. European Journal of Higher Education. 14(2). 228–248. 2 indexed citations

Wit, A. de, et al.. (2022). The health advantage of volunteering is larger for older and less healthy volunteers in Europe: a mega-analysis. European Journal of Ageing. 19(4). 1189–1200. 13 indexed citations

Ma, Ji, et al.. (2021). Computational Social Science for Nonprofit Studies: Developing a Toolbox and Knowledge Base for the Field. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 34(1). 52–63. 11 indexed citations

Bekkers, René, et al.. (2020). Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey – User Manual (version 2.16).. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 4 indexed citations

Wit, A. de, et al.. (2018). Volunteering and Wellbeing Among Ageing Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 30(1). 115–128. 49 indexed citations

Wit, A. de, et al.. (2017). Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations

10.

Wit, A. de, Michaela Neumayr, Femida Handy, & Pamala Wiepking. (2017). Do Government Expenditures Shift Private Philanthropic Donations to Particular Fields of Welfare? Evidence from Cross-country Data. European Sociological Review. 34(1). 6–21. 15 indexed citations

11.

Wit, A. de, M.I. Broese Van Groenou, Erik van Ingen, & René Bekkers. (2016). Why Do People Volunteer?. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations

12.

Wit, A. de, René Bekkers, & M.I. Broese Van Groenou. (2016). Heterogeneity in Crowding-out: When Are Charitable Donations Responsive to Government Support?. European Sociological Review. jcw048–jcw048. 13 indexed citations

13.

Boer, Alice de, et al.. (2016). Twee manieren om te vragen of iemand mantelzorg geeft. TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen. 94(7). 256–258. 1 indexed citations

14.

Wit, A. de & René Bekkers. (2016). Government Support and Charitable Donations: A Meta-Analysis of the Crowding-out Hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. muw044–muw044. 75 indexed citations

15.

Wit, A. de & René Bekkers. (2015). Exploring Gender Differences in Charitable Giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 45(4). 741–761. 42 indexed citations

16.

Wit, A. de, et al.. (2015). Welfare impacts of participation. Deliverable 3.3 of the project: “Impact of the Third Sector as Social Innovation” (ITSSOIN). VU Research Portal. 3 indexed citations

17.

Aarts, Noëlle, et al.. (2011). Frames to the planning game: administrative geography and local opposition to open space loss. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 35(5). 969–987. 1 indexed citations

18.

Dijk, Terry van, Noëlle Aarts, & A. de Wit. (2010). Frames to the Planning Game. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. no–no. 6 indexed citations

19.

Wit, A. de & Albertine J. Schuit. (2006). Kosten-effectiviteit en implementatie: De theorie van economische evaluatie versus de public health-praktijk. Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment). 84(5). 11–13. 1 indexed citations

20.

Wit, A. de, et al.. (1997). Zonder grenzen geen spel. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie. 23(6). 242–248.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact