A. D. Lovie

563 total citations
18 papers, 294 citations indexed

About

A. D. Lovie is a scholar working on General Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, A. D. Lovie has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 294 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Psychology, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in A. D. Lovie's work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (8 papers), Social Representations and Identity (3 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers). A. D. Lovie is often cited by papers focused on Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (8 papers), Social Representations and Identity (3 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers). A. D. Lovie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. A. D. Lovie's co-authors include Stanley Wasserman, Peter Lynn, Judith Covey and Ann D. M. Davies and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and British Journal of Psychology.

In The Last Decade

A. D. Lovie

18 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

A. D. Lovie
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Social Psychology 48
  • Artificial Intelligence 38
  • Management Science and Operations Research 37
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 33
  • Statistics and Probability 32
Replace Thornton B. Roby with:
Thornton B. Roby United States
Rebecca M. Pliske United States
Charles O. Neidt United States
Sarah Piechowski Germany
Curtis Kennett United States
Valerie M. Chase Switzerland
David Torres Irribarra Chile
Sophia Crüwell Germany
Joan H. Criswell
Olmo R. van den Akker Netherlands
Thornton B. Roby United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to A. D. Lovie
A. D. Lovie · 1×
Citations per year, relative to A. D. Lovie
A. D. Lovie · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by A. D. Lovie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. D. Lovie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. D. Lovie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. D. Lovie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. D. Lovie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. D. Lovie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. D. Lovie. The network helps show where A. D. Lovie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. D. Lovie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. D. Lovie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. D. Lovie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. D. Lovie. A. D. Lovie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
Psychology in Britain: Historical essays and personal reflections.
48
2 10
3 6
4 5
5 11
6 27
7 7
8
Context and commitment: A psychology of science
1
9 23
10 47
11 2
12 56
13
Attention and Behaviorism--Fact and Fiction.
3
14 19
15 5
16 12
17 11
18 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026