A. C. Spearing
Impact in
Papers in
- Classics 23
- Medieval Literature and History 23
- Medieval Iberian Studies 4
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 2
- Byzantine Studies and History 2
-
- Linguistics and language evolution 3
- Co-authors
- R. T. Davies (1 shared paper)Douglas Gray (1 shared paper)Geoffrey Chaucer (3 shared papers)Derek Pearsall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Studies in the age of Chaucer (3 papers)Speculum (3 papers)The Review of English Studies (2 papers)The Chaucer Review (2 papers)Modern Philology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
A. C. Spearing
22 papers receiving 90 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Classics 239
- History 107
- Literature and Literary Theory 82
- Language and Linguistics 53
- Religious studies 13
Countries citing papers authored by A. C. Spearing
This map shows the geographic impact of A. C. Spearing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. C. Spearing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. C. Spearing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. C. Spearing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. C. Spearing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. C. Spearing. The network helps show where A. C. Spearing may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside A. C. Spearing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Medieval to Renaissance in English Poetry | 1985 | 48 |
| 2 | 1979 | 45 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 38 | |
| 4 | The Gawain-Poet: A Critical Study | 1971 | 31 |
| 5 | Criticism and medieval poetry | 1964 | 28 |
| 6 | Readings in medieval poetry | 1987 | 21 |
| 7 | 1990 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1962 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1982 | 4 | |
| 16 | The Cloud of Unknowing and Other Works | 1978 | 3 |
| 17 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 19 | The Knight's tale :from The Canterbury tales | 1966 | 2 |
| 20 | 1960 | 2 |
About A. C. Spearing
A. C. Spearing is a scholar working on Classics, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 33 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (23 papers), Medieval Iberian Studies (4 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (239 citations), History (107 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (82 citations), Language and Linguistics (53 citations) and Religious studies (13 citations). A. C. Spearing has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. T. Davies, Douglas Gray, Geoffrey Chaucer and Derek Pearsall. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in the age of Chaucer, Speculum, The Review of English Studies, The Chaucer Review and Modern Philology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.