A. C. Clutter

882 total citations
26 papers, 651 citations indexed

About

A. C. Clutter is a scholar working on Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, A. C. Clutter has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 651 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Genetics, 9 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 8 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in A. C. Clutter's work include Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (7 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers). A. C. Clutter is often cited by papers focused on Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (7 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers). A. C. Clutter collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. A. C. Clutter's co-authors include M. K. Nielsen, Daniel Pomp, M. L. Day, J. E. Kinder, Kazuhiko Imakawa, D. D. Zalesky, W. Barendse, D. S. Buchanan, Pamela Wolfe and R. K. Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Genetics, Journal of Dairy Science and Biology of Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

A. C. Clutter

26 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. C. Clutter United States 14 393 272 218 106 85 26 651
G.E. Dahl United States 17 326 0.8× 569 2.1× 482 2.2× 163 1.5× 104 1.2× 27 952
Y. Guérin France 15 242 0.6× 374 1.4× 141 0.6× 73 0.7× 75 0.9× 27 740
L. Dusza Poland 16 224 0.6× 247 0.9× 139 0.6× 154 1.5× 23 0.3× 46 672
P. Kunz Switzerland 17 332 0.8× 543 2.0× 311 1.4× 127 1.2× 17 0.2× 29 892
Tokushi Komatsu Japan 15 157 0.4× 230 0.8× 119 0.5× 66 0.6× 88 1.0× 32 558
A.J. Sheahan New Zealand 15 293 0.7× 409 1.5× 145 0.7× 66 0.6× 58 0.7× 19 544
M. A. Diekman United States 12 205 0.5× 525 1.9× 112 0.5× 104 1.0× 28 0.3× 24 759
L.M. Chagas Australia 13 465 1.2× 603 2.2× 191 0.9× 58 0.5× 224 2.6× 17 929
D.E. Grum United States 14 598 1.5× 833 3.1× 216 1.0× 67 0.6× 28 0.3× 20 958
Alessandro Malfatti Italy 13 195 0.5× 267 1.0× 139 0.6× 76 0.7× 26 0.3× 45 478

Countries citing papers authored by A. C. Clutter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. C. Clutter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. C. Clutter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. C. Clutter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. C. Clutter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. C. Clutter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. C. Clutter. The network helps show where A. C. Clutter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. C. Clutter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. C. Clutter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. C. Clutter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. C. Clutter. A. C. Clutter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Geisert, R. D., et al.. (2007). Embryonic Loss in Sows with Repeated Propensity for Small Litter Size. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 42(3). 333–335. 4 indexed citations
2.
Kim, Kwang Soo, Eduardo Méndez, Stefan L. Marklund, et al.. (2000). Rapid communication: linkage mapping of the porcine Agouti gene.. Journal of Animal Science. 78(5). 1395–1395. 5 indexed citations
3.
Clutter, A. C., Satoshi Sasaki, & Daniel Pomp. (1998). Rapid communication: the cholecystokinin type-A receptor (CCKAR) gene maps to porcine chromosome 8.. Journal of Animal Science. 76(7). 1983–1983. 3 indexed citations
4.
Clutter, A. C., et al.. (1998). Plasma Cholecystokinin-8 in Pigs With Divergent Genetic Potential for Feed Intake and Growth. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. 15(1). 9–21. 12 indexed citations
5.
Casas, Eduardo, et al.. (1997). Mapping genomic regions associated with growth rate in pigs.. Journal of Animal Science. 75(8). 2047–2047. 38 indexed citations
6.
Pomp, Daniel, et al.. (1997). Rapid communication: mapping of leptin to bovine chromosome 4 by linkage analysis of a PCR-based polymorphism.. Journal of Animal Science. 75(5). 1427–1427. 72 indexed citations
7.
Clutter, A. C., et al.. (1997). Relationship of growth hormone and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 genotypes with growth and carcass traits in swine. Animal Genetics. 28(2). 88–93. 46 indexed citations
8.
Clutter, A. C., et al.. (1996). Polymerase chain reaction‐based polymorphisms in the porcine cholecystokinin (CCK) gene and assignment to chromosome 13. Animal Genetics. 27(5). 369–370. 3 indexed citations
9.
Sasaki, S., A. C. Clutter, & Daniel Pomp. (1996). Assignment of the porcine obese (leptin) gene to Chromosome 18 by linkage analysis of a new PCR-based polymorphism. Mammalian Genome. 7(6). 471–472. 20 indexed citations
10.
Nielsen, M. K., et al.. (1996). Estimates of heritabilities and genetic and environmental correlations for left- and right-side uterine capacity and ovulation rate in mice.. Journal of Animal Science. 74(3). 529–529. 8 indexed citations
11.
Clutter, A. C., et al.. (1995). Effect of divergent selection for postweaning average daily gain on front-end soundness of market-weight pigs1. Journal of Animal Science. 73(7). 1940–1947. 8 indexed citations
13.
Clutter, A. C., et al.. (1994). Uterine capacity and ovulation rate in mice selected 21 generations on alternative criteria to increase litter size. Journal of Animal Science. 72(3). 577–583. 19 indexed citations
14.
Clutter, A. C., et al.. (1992). Growth and carcass characteristics of pigs selected for fast or slow gain in relation to feed intake and efficiency. Journal of Animal Science. 70(4). 1049–1059. 24 indexed citations
15.
Gion, Jean‐Marc, A. C. Clutter, & M. K. Nielsen. (1990). Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: II. Response to thirteen generations of selection.. Journal of Animal Science. 68(11). 3543–3543. 29 indexed citations
16.
Clutter, A. C., M. K. Nielsen, & R. K. Johnson. (1990). Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: I. Characterization of base population and development of methods.. Journal of Animal Science. 68(11). 3536–3536. 36 indexed citations
17.
Stumpf, T. T., M. L. Day, Michael W. Wolfe, et al.. (1989). Effect of Estradiol on Secretion of Luteinizing Hormone during the Follicular Phase of the Bovine Estrous Cycle1. Biology of Reproduction. 41(1). 91–97. 16 indexed citations
18.
Clutter, A. C., et al.. (1989). Threshold Model Analysis of Dystocia in Dairy Cattle When Progeny Information is Limited. Journal of Dairy Science. 72(12). 3264–3272. 8 indexed citations
19.
Stumpf, T. T., M. L. Day, Pamela Wolfe, et al.. (1988). Feedback of 17β-Estradiol on Secretion of Luteinizing Hormone during Different Seasons of the Year. Journal of Animal Science. 66(2). 447–447. 12 indexed citations
20.
Day, M. L., Kazuhiko Imakawa, A. C. Clutter, et al.. (1987). Suckling Behavior of Calves with Dams Varying in Milk Production. Journal of Animal Science. 65(5). 1207–1212. 70 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026