A. B. Chilton
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Radiation top 2%
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Richard E. FawJ. Kenneth ShultisRobert G. JaegerC.M. EisenhauerRalph W. StacyJohn N. CooperJames C. HarrisD. Camel
- Topics
- Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (15 papers)Nuclear Physics and Applications (10 papers)Nuclear and radioactivity studies (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
A. B. Chilton
44 papers receiving 658 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Materials Chemistry 413
- Radiation 300
- Aerospace Engineering 138
- Biomedical Engineering 102
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 101
Countries citing papers authored by A. B. Chilton
This map shows the geographic impact of A. B. Chilton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. B. Chilton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. B. Chilton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. B. Chilton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. B. Chilton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. B. Chilton. The network helps show where A. B. Chilton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. B. Chilton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. B. Chilton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. B. Chilton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. B. Chilton. A. B. Chilton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Low-energy photon dose deposition in tissue slab and spherical phantoms | 2 |
| 2 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | Neutron fluence-to-dose-index conversion factors based on the standard ICRV phantom. [0. 1 to 20. 0 MeV] | 2 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF THE GAMMA-RAY SHIELDING CHARACTERISTICS OF A RIBBED SLAB, | 1 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | MONTE CARLO CALCULATION OF THE SPECTRUM OF GAMMA RADIATION FROM A COLLIMATED CO-60 SOURCE | 3 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About A. B. Chilton
A. B. Chilton is a scholar working on Radiation, Acoustics and Ultrasonics and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 44 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (15 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (10 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (300 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (74 citations) and Materials Chemistry (413 citations). A. B. Chilton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard E. Faw, J. Kenneth Shultis, Robert G. Jaeger, C.M. Eisenhauer, Ralph W. Stacy, John N. Cooper, James C. Harris, D. Camel, B. Billia and B. Drevet. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Crystal Growth, Radiation Research and Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.