Countries where authors publish in Zoological Letters
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Zoological Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Zoological Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zoological Letters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Zoological Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Zoological Letters.
About Zoological Letters
The 239 papers published in Zoological Letters in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Zoological Letters usually cover Paleontology (23 papers), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (15 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (45 papers), Physiology (9 papers) and Aging (3 papers) specifically the topics of Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (23 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (21 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (21 papers), Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (15 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (14 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Zoological Letters are Shigeru Kuratani, Tatsuya Hirasawa, Joachim T. Haug, Carolin Haug, Kiyokazu Agata, Yoshio Takei, Takema Fukatsu, Patrick Müller, Outa Uryu and Ryusuke Niwa.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.