Chinese Journal of Traumatology

897 papers and 6.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 897 papers published in Chinese Journal of Traumatology in the last decades have received a total of 6.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Journal of Traumatology usually cover Surgery (513 papers), Epidemiology (212 papers) and Emergency Medicine (164 papers) specifically the topics of Bone fractures and treatments (125 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (120 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Journal of Traumatology are Chun Qing, Michael Chopp, Asim Mahmood, Ye Xiong, Andrew I.R. Maas, Vafa Rahimi‐Movaghar, Mahnaz Yadollahi, Sunil Munakomi, Xiaobing Fu and Cuiping Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Journal of Traumatology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Journal of Traumatology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Journal of Traumatology.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Journal of Traumatology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Journal of Traumatology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Journal of Traumatology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Journal of Traumatology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025