Chinese Physics

2.6k papers and 21.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Chinese Physics in the last decades have received a total of 21.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Physics usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (641 papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (573 papers) specifically the topics of Quantum Information and Cryptography (249 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (206 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (171 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Physics are Baochang Shi, Mei Feng-Xiang, Zhaoli Guo, Chuguang Zheng, Cheng-shi Liu, Jun‐Guo Lu, Chongxin Liu, Mao-Fa Fang, Yu Xue and Xiangwei Chen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025