World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research

1.4k citations
232 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research

196 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 502
  • Transportation 325
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 318
  • Strategy and Management 472
  • Building and Construction 364
Replace Maritime Business Review with:
Maritime Business Review Taiwan
Transport and Telecommunication Journal Latvia
NETNOMICS Economic Research and Electronic Networking United States
Journal of Management Science and Engineering China
Journal of Transportation Security United States
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries Germany
Engineering Management in Production and Services Poland
Review of Network Economics United States
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs Sweden
European Journal of Futures Research Germany
World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research relative to Maritime Business Review Taiwan Maritime Business Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Maritime Business Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published in World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research.

About World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research

The 232 papers published in World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research usually cover Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (79 papers), Transportation (49 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (45 papers), Building and Construction (64 papers) and Strategy and Management (58 papers) specifically the topics of Maritime Ports and Logistics (69 papers), Urban and Freight Transport Logistics (45 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (42 papers), Transport and Economic Policies (33 papers), Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (30 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (23 papers), Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency (16 papers) and Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research are Violeta Roso, Olli‐Pekka Hilmola, Rickard Bergqvist, Yair Wiseman, Luciano Fratocchi, Seock‐Jin Hong, Anming Zhang, Jason Monios, Per Hilletofth and Moshe Givoni.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact