Review of Network Economics

324 papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 324 papers published in Review of Network Economics in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Network Economics usually cover Strategy and Management (224 papers), Media Technology (171 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (143 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Platforms and Economics (177 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (171 papers) and Merger and Competition Analysis (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Network Economics are David S. Evans, Julian Wright, Theo Notteboom, Roberto Roson, Andrei Hagiu, Sujit Chakravorti, Michael Kosfeld, Mary R. Brooks, Jean‐Charles Rochet and Paul L. Joskow.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Network Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Network Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Network Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Network Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Network Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Network Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Network Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025