Comparative Economic Studies

990 papers and 12.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 990 papers published in Comparative Economic Studies in the last decades have received a total of 12.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative Economic Studies usually cover Economics and Econometrics (414 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (258 papers) and Finance (251 papers) specifically the topics of Global Financial Crisis and Policies (194 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (130 papers) and Russia and Soviet political economy (114 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Economic Studies are Martin C. Spechler, Jozef M. van Brabant, Владимир Попов, David M. Kemme, Laurent Weill, Arusha Cooray, Vlad Manole, David Grigorian, Frederic L. Pryor and Dubravko Mihaljek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comparative Economic Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Economic Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Economic Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Comparative Economic Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Economic Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Economic Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Economic Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025