Replace Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics with:
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid MechanicsChina
Journal of Marine Science and TechnologyJapan
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean EngineeringSouth Korea
Wind EngineeringUnited States
Wind energy scienceGermany
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M Journal of Engineering for the Maritime EnvironmentChina
Journal of Ship ResearchUnited States
International journal of computational fluid dynamicsUnited States
Theoretical and Computational Fluid DynamicsUnited States
International Journal of Offshore and Polar EngineeringUnited States
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid MechanicsChinaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Wind and Structures
Wind and Structures · 1×
×0.64.4kEE
×1.47.4kCM
×1.14.7kAE
×0.83.0kCSE
×0.5925AS
Citations per year, relative to Wind and Structures
Wind and Structures · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Wind and Structures
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wind and Structures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wind and Structures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wind and Structures more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Wind and Structures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wind and Structures.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.