Voice and Speech Review

379 papers and 894 indexed citations i.

About

The 379 papers published in Voice and Speech Review in the last decades have received a total of 894 indexed citations. Papers published in Voice and Speech Review usually cover Music (129 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (59 papers) and Physiology (50 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Musicological Studies (56 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (50 papers) and Voice and Speech Disorders (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Voice and Speech Review are Matthew C. Hoch, Lynn Ann Watson, Ronald C. Scherer, Tom Burke, Nancy C. Elliott, Joseph C. Stemple, Rosina Lippi-Green, Deborah Du Nann Winter, Celia Stewart and Ingo R. Titze.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Voice and Speech Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Voice and Speech Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Voice and Speech Review.

Countries where authors publish in Voice and Speech Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Voice and Speech Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Voice and Speech Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Voice and Speech Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025