Virtual Reality

1.3k papers and 19.9k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Virtual Reality in the last decades have received a total of 19.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Virtual Reality usually cover Human-Computer Interaction (739 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (461 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (274 papers) specifically the topics of Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (635 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (313 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (152 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Virtual Reality are Judy M. Vance, Lisa Rebenitsch, Charles B. Owen, Leif P. Berg, Eric Krokos, Amitabh Varshney, Volodymyr Kindratenko, Νικόλαος Πέλλας, Ioannis Kazanidis and Stephen Palmisano.

In The Last Decade

Virtual Reality

1.1k papers receiving 18.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Virtual Reality

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Virtual Reality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Virtual Reality.

Countries where authors publish in Virtual Reality

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Virtual Reality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Virtual Reality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virtual Reality more than expected).

Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays 2016 2026 2019 2022 484
  1. Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays (2016)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026