Replace Editor-in-Chief s Voice List of Authors is an Important Element in a Scientific Publication with:
Editor-in-Chief s Voice List of Authors is an Important Element in a Scientific PublicationPoland
Arab Journal of UrologyEgypt
Investigative and Clinical UrologySouth Korea
Scandinavian Journal of UrologySweden
Korean journal of urologySouth Korea
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e AndrologiaItaly
Fetal and Pediatric PathologyUnited States
European Urology Open ScienceUnited States
Current UrologyUnited States
Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRIUnited States
Editor-in-Chief s Voice List of Authors is an Important Element in a Scientific PublicationPolandView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Urology Annals
Urology Annals · 1×
×0.62.1kSURGE
×0.82.2kPRM
×0.81.7kUROLO
×0.6978PPCH
×0.81.1kRHEUM
Citations per year, relative to Urology Annals
Urology Annals · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Urology Annals
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Urology Annals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Urology Annals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urology Annals more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Urology Annals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Urology Annals.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.