TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY

1.5k papers and 15.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY in the last decades have received a total of 15.4k indexed citations. Papers published in TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY usually cover Plant Science (1.1k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (842 papers) and Molecular Biology (322 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies (457 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (251 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (209 papers). The most active scholars publishing in TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY are Losanka P. Popova, Tuan Anh Tran, Zekí Aytaç, Şükran Dere, Abdullah Kaya, Kani Işık, Muhammad Ashraf, Fatma Özhatay, Füsun Ertuğ and Lütfi Behçet.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY.

Countries where authors publish in TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025