Trends in Organized Crime

588 papers and 5.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 588 papers published in Trends in Organized Crime in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Trends in Organized Crime usually cover Sociology and Political Science (441 papers), Epidemiology (95 papers) and Information Systems (73 papers) specifically the topics of Organized Crime and Criminal Networks Analysis (338 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (173 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Organized Crime are William Reno, James O. Finckenauer, Klaus von Lampe, Viridiana Ríos, Georgios A. Antonopoulos, Daan van Uhm, Melvin Soudijn, Janine R. Wedel, Rutger Leukfeldt and Dina Siegel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trends in Organized Crime

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Organized Crime. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Organized Crime.

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Organized Crime

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Organized Crime. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Organized Crime with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Organized Crime more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025