Transfusion Medicine Reviews

1.2k papers and 30.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Transfusion Medicine Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 30.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Transfusion Medicine Reviews usually cover Hematology (509 papers), Biochemistry (302 papers) and Management of Technology and Innovation (190 papers) specifically the topics of Blood transfusion and management (302 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (295 papers) and Blood donation and transfusion practices (190 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Transfusion Medicine Reviews are Sunny Dzik, Eleftherios C. Vamvakas, Christopher D. Hillyer, Morris A. Blajchman, Mindy Goldman, George Garratty, Samuel Sowemimo‐Coker, Sherrill J. Slichter, Harold T. Meryman and Thierry Burnouf.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Transfusion Medicine Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Transfusion Medicine Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Transfusion Medicine Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Transfusion Medicine Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Transfusion Medicine Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Transfusion Medicine Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transfusion Medicine Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025