Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods

1.6k papers and 23.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods in the last decades have received a total of 23.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods usually cover Molecular Biology (481 papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (373 papers) and Plant Science (294 papers) specifically the topics of Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (165 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (153 papers) and Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods are Zhushan Fu, Shuhua Xi, Sanjiv Singh, Ramesh C. Gupta, Mohammad Abdollahi, Elżbieta Skrzydlewska, Carol A. Marchant, Santosh Kumar, Subir Kumar Maulik and Iwona Zwolak.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods.

Countries where authors publish in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025