Techniques in Orthopaedics

1.2k papers and 6.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics in the last decades have received a total of 6.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics usually cover Surgery (1.1k papers), Epidemiology (402 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (217 papers) specifically the topics of Bone fractures and treatments (308 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (277 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (276 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Techniques in Orthopaedics are Lawrence D. Dorr, Thomas Sampson, Richard B. Caspari, Dror Paley, Scott A. Rodeo, Russell F. Warren, Stuart A. Green, J. Norgrove Penny, Clifford W. Colwell and Mary E. Hardwick.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics.

Countries where authors publish in Techniques in Orthopaedics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Techniques in Orthopaedics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Techniques in Orthopaedics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Techniques in Orthopaedics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025