Facilities

1.5k papers and 22.4k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Facilities in the last decades have received a total of 22.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Facilities usually cover Social Psychology (725 papers), Building and Construction (557 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (285 papers) specifically the topics of Facilities and Workplace Management (701 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (269 papers) and BIM and Construction Integration (253 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Facilities are Peter A. Bullen, Wolfgang Preiser, Michael Pitt, Sarel Lavy, Bev Nutt, Keith Alexander, Adrian Leaman, Barry Haynes, David Baldry and Peter Ellis.

In The Last Decade

Facilities

1.2k papers receiving 18.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Facilities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Facilities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Facilities.

Countries where authors publish in Facilities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Facilities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Facilities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Facilities more than expected).

Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland – what and how? 2016 2026 2019 2022 77
  1. Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland – what and how? (2016)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026