Theoretical Linguistics

581 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 581 papers published in Theoretical Linguistics in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Theoretical Linguistics usually cover Language and Linguistics (284 papers), Artificial Intelligence (178 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (125 papers) specifically the topics of Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (230 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (132 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theoretical Linguistics are Lauri Karttunen, Christopher Potts, Philippe Schlenker, Danny Fox, Tanya Reinhart, Heidi Harley, David Pesetsky, Bart Geurts, Marcel den Dikken and Maria Polinsky.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theoretical Linguistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theoretical Linguistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theoretical Linguistics.

Countries where authors publish in Theoretical Linguistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theoretical Linguistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theoretical Linguistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theoretical Linguistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025