The Psychoanalytic Review

661 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 661 papers published in The Psychoanalytic Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The Psychoanalytic Review usually cover Clinical Psychology (441 papers), Social Psychology (111 papers) and Philosophy (109 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (373 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (108 papers) and Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Psychoanalytic Review are George Fox Mott, C. Edward Watkins, W. W. Meissner, Robert D. Stolorow, Otto F. Kernberg, Nancy McWilliams, Diana Fosha, Zvi Lothane, Michael Eigen and Slavoj Žižek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Psychoanalytic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Psychoanalytic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Psychoanalytic Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Psychoanalytic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Psychoanalytic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Psychoanalytic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Psychoanalytic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025