The Cerebellum

1.8k papers and 40.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in The Cerebellum in the last decades have received a total of 40.6k indexed citations. Papers published in The Cerebellum usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (876 papers), Neurology (720 papers) and Molecular Biology (635 papers) specifically the topics of Vestibular and auditory disorders (618 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (573 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (377 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Cerebellum are Catherine J. Stoodley, Jeremy D. Schmahmann, Mario Manto, Mario‐Ubaldo Manto, Dennis J.L.G. Schutter, Marco Molinari, Maria Leggio, Noriyuki Koibuchi, Dagmar Timmann and Antonio Contestabile.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Cerebellum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Cerebellum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Cerebellum.

Countries where authors publish in The Cerebellum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Cerebellum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Cerebellum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Cerebellum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025