Forensic Sciences Research

337 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 337 papers published in Forensic Sciences Research in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Forensic Sciences Research usually cover Genetics (93 papers), Archeology (89 papers) and Molecular Biology (63 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (86 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (80 papers) and Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forensic Sciences Research are Ricardo Jorge Dinis‐Oliveira, Douglas H. Ubelaker, Alex Forrest, Olaf H. Drummer, Daniel J. Wescott, Eric J. Bartelink, Lesley A. Chesson, Jessica J. Miller, Shivpoojan Kori and Teresa Magalhães.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forensic Sciences Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forensic Sciences Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forensic Sciences Research.

Countries where authors publish in Forensic Sciences Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forensic Sciences Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forensic Sciences Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forensic Sciences Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025