Theoretical Economics

548 papers and 8.6k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 548 papers published in Theoretical Economics in the last decades have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Theoretical Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (384 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (383 papers) and Safety Research (139 papers) specifically the topics of Auction Theory and Applications (242 papers), Game Theory and Applications (219 papers) and Economic theories and models (176 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theoretical Economics are Ran Spiegler, Marciano Siniscalchi, Anton Kolotilin, William H. Sandholm, Dirk Bergemann, Stephen Morris, Daron Acemoğlu, Manuel Mueller-Frank, M. Utku Ünver and Alexander Wolitzky.

In The Last Decade

Theoretical Economics

506 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Theoretical Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theoretical Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theoretical Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Theoretical Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theoretical Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theoretical Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theoretical Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026