Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

4.3k papers and 55.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy in the last decades have received a total of 55.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy usually cover Surgery (2.8k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (767 papers) and Epidemiology (663 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (502 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (373 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (364 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy are Marios Loukas, R. Shane Tubbs, Figen Gövsa, Samy A. Azer, Kun Hwang, Lee Y, Yelda Pınar, Carla Stecco, Norm Eizenberg and Akira Uchino.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

Countries where authors publish in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025