Smith College Studies in Social Work

793 papers and 5.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 793 papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work usually cover Clinical Psychology (416 papers), Public Administration (177 papers) and Social Psychology (160 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (177 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (165 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (139 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Smith College Studies in Social Work are Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart, Carolyn Saari, Eunjung Lee, Brian Rasmussen, James W. Drisko, Joshua Miller, Carol Tosone, Joan Berzoff, Ruth Dean and Ann A. O’Connell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work.

Countries where authors publish in Smith College Studies in Social Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Smith College Studies in Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Smith College Studies in Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Smith College Studies in Social Work more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025