Studies in Regional Science

623 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 623 papers published in Studies in Regional Science in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Regional Science usually cover Economics and Econometrics (277 papers), Transportation (78 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (71 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (95 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (47 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Regional Science are Yoshiro Higano, Suminori Tokunaga, Peter Nijkamp, Akira Kiminami, Hiroyuki Shibusawa, Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, Bart Jourquin, Amitrajeet A. Batabyal, Robert J. Stimson and Prem Chhetri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Regional Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Regional Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Regional Science.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Regional Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Regional Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Regional Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Regional Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025