Countries where authors publish in Studies in History
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in History more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in History.
About Studies in History
The 324 papers published in Studies in History in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Studies in History usually cover Anthropology (124 papers), Religious studies (38 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (141 papers) specifically the topics of South Asian Studies and Conflicts (77 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (54 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (46 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (36 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (32 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (27 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (23 papers) and Eurasian Exchange Networks (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in History are André Gunder Frank, Radhika Singha, Prabhu P. Mohapatra, Tanika Sarkar, Mahesh Rangarajan, K. N. Panikkar, Prashant Kidambi, Dilip M. Menon, Michael Mann and Aijaz Ahmad.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.