Stroke Research and Treatment

356 papers and 8.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 356 papers published in Stroke Research and Treatment in the last decades have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Stroke Research and Treatment usually cover Epidemiology (177 papers), Rehabilitation (140 papers) and Neurology (107 papers) specifically the topics of Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (172 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (140 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stroke Research and Treatment are Eric S. Donkor, Shin‐Ichi Izumi, Naoyuki Takeuchi, Julie Bernhardt, Kavian Ghandehari, Reg C. Morris, Jonathan Sturm, R. Loch Macdonald, Gillian Mead and Sandra A. Billinger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Stroke Research and Treatment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Stroke Research and Treatment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stroke Research and Treatment.

Countries where authors publish in Stroke Research and Treatment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stroke Research and Treatment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stroke Research and Treatment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stroke Research and Treatment more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025