Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

About

The 913 papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports in the last decades have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports usually cover Molecular Biology (475 papers), Genetics (298 papers) and Surgery (194 papers) specifically the topics of Mesenchymal stem cell research (286 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (155 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (134 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports are Henning Ulrich, Micheli Mainardi Pillat, Ali Golchin, Abdolreza Ardeshirylajimi, Mariusz Z. Ratajczak, Ehsan Seyedjafari, Matthew Trawczynski, Brian T. David, Richard G. Fessler and David M. Smadja.

In The Last Decade

Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

845 papers receiving 12.7k citations

Countries where authors publish in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stem Cell Reviews and Reports more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026