Skeletal Radiology

7.2k papers and 129.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.2k papers published in Skeletal Radiology in the last decades have received a total of 129.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Skeletal Radiology usually cover Surgery (3.5k papers), Rheumatology (2.5k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1.2k papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (1.2k papers) and Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments (878 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Skeletal Radiology are Murray K. Dalinka, Arthur S. Patchefsky, R. E. Brennan, J R Von Ronnen, Adam Greenspan, Donald Resnick, John A. Ogden, Arthur A. De Smet, Mark E. Schweitzer and Asif Saifuddin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Skeletal Radiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Skeletal Radiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Skeletal Radiology.

Countries where authors publish in Skeletal Radiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Skeletal Radiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Skeletal Radiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Skeletal Radiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025