Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Case report 3
19763.7k citationsArthur S. Patchefsky et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Arthur S. Patchefsky
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur S. Patchefsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur S. Patchefsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur S. Patchefsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur S. Patchefsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur S. Patchefsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur S. Patchefsky. The network helps show where Arthur S. Patchefsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arthur S. Patchefsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arthur S. Patchefsky.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arthur S. Patchefsky based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Arthur S. Patchefsky. Arthur S. Patchefsky is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kuesel, Annette C., Kristin Padavic‐Shaller, Joseph Murphy‐Boesch, et al.. (1996). Metabolic characterization of human soft tissue sarcomas in vivo and in vitro using proton-decoupled phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy.. PubMed. 56(13). 2964–72.16 indexed citations
7.
Padmore, Ruth, Jonathan F. Lara, Tracy L. Gales, et al.. (1996). Primary combined malignant melanoma and ductal carcinoma of the breast. A report of two cases.. PubMed. 78(12). 2515–25.43 indexed citations
8.
Katsetos, Christos D., et al.. (1994). Novel immunohistochemical localization of 28,000 molecular-weight (Mr) calcium binding protein (calbindin-D28k) in enterochromaffin cells of the human appendix and neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids and small-cell carcinomas) of the midgut and foregut.. PubMed. 118(6). 633–9.16 indexed citations
Schwartz, Gordon F., Feig Sa, H I Libshitz, et al.. (1976). Mass screening for breast disease. Results, problems, and expectations.. Library Stack (Library Stack). 48(2). 137–41.3 indexed citations
14.
Patchefsky, Arthur S., et al.. (1976). Pulmonary blastoma: cytopathologic and histopathologic findings.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 20(4). 381–6.9 indexed citations
15.
Hoch, Willis S., et al.. (1974). Pulmonary dirofilariasis. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 67(1). 159–163.8 indexed citations
Patchefsky, Arthur S., et al.. (1971). Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia. Annals of Internal Medicine. 74(3). 322–327.24 indexed citations
20.
Long, Junyu & Arthur S. Patchefsky. (1971). Primary Hodgkin's disease of the ovary. A case report.. PubMed. 38(5). 680–2.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.