Security and Human Rights

220 papers and 431 indexed citations i.

About

The 220 papers published in Security and Human Rights in the last decades have received a total of 431 indexed citations. Papers published in Security and Human Rights usually cover Political Science and International Relations (165 papers), Sociology and Political Science (72 papers) and General Health Professions (16 papers) specifically the topics of Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (66 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (56 papers) and European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Security and Human Rights are Max Bader, Conny Rijken, Edwin Bakker, Ekaterina R. Rashkova, David Lewis, Arun Kundnani, Uładzisłaŭ Bełavusaŭ, Bill Bowring, Andrew Wilson and Neil J. Melvin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Security and Human Rights

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Security and Human Rights. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Security and Human Rights.

Countries where authors publish in Security and Human Rights

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Security and Human Rights. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Security and Human Rights with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Security and Human Rights more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025