Scandinavian Journal of Pain

987 papers and 10.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 987 papers published in Scandinavian Journal of Pain in the last decades have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Scandinavian Journal of Pain usually cover Pharmacology (482 papers), Physiology (289 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (228 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (455 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (259 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (158 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scandinavian Journal of Pain are Marzia Malcangio, Harald Breivik, Steven J. Linton, Roberta Chow, Maurizio Manuguerra, Gillian Z. Heller, Lars Arendt‐Nielsen, Mark P. Jensen, Gabriel Tan and Jordi Miró.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Scandinavian Journal of Pain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scandinavian Journal of Pain.

Countries where authors publish in Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scandinavian Journal of Pain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scandinavian Journal of Pain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scandinavian Journal of Pain more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025