Rocks & Minerals

1.4k papers and 2.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Rocks & Minerals in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Rocks & Minerals usually cover Geochemistry and Petrology (582 papers), Geophysics (361 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (322 papers) specifically the topics of Mineralogy and Gemology Studies (561 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (348 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (322 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rocks & Minerals are David London, John Rakovan, Anthony R. Kampf, Robert B. Cook, John A. Jaszczak, Richard S. Mitchell, Bruce Cairncross, Steven C. Chamberlain, Arthur E. Smith and Carl A. Francis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rocks & Minerals

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rocks & Minerals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rocks & Minerals.

Countries where authors publish in Rocks & Minerals

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rocks & Minerals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rocks & Minerals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rocks & Minerals more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025