Sight & sound/Sight and sound

842 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 842 papers published in Sight & sound/Sight and sound in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Sight & sound/Sight and sound usually cover Economics and Econometrics (89 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (38 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (37 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (89 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (17 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (10 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sight & sound/Sight and sound are Kevin Jackson, Nick James, Ginette Vincendeau, Ben Walters, Richard Kelly, Thomas Elsaesser, Matthew Leyland, Peter Wollen, Mark Olsen and Janet Bergstrom.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sight & sound/Sight and sound

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sight & sound/Sight and sound. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sight & sound/Sight and sound.

Countries where authors publish in Sight & sound/Sight and sound

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sight & sound/Sight and sound. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sight & sound/Sight and sound with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sight & sound/Sight and sound more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025