Reviews of Geophysics

1.7k papers and 259.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Reviews of Geophysics in the last decades have received a total of 259.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Reviews of Geophysics usually cover Atmospheric Science (599 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (547 papers) and Geophysics (547 papers) specifically the topics of Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (317 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (306 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (236 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews of Geophysics are Tetsuji Yamada, George L. Mellor, Richard M. Iverson, Chidong Zhang, Robert A. Houze, S. M. McLennan, Stuart Ross Taylor, Alan Robock, Susan Solomon and C. K. Goertz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reviews of Geophysics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews of Geophysics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews of Geophysics.

Countries where authors publish in Reviews of Geophysics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews of Geophysics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews of Geophysics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews of Geophysics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025