Results in Physics

6.9k papers and 117.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.9k papers published in Results in Physics in the last decades have received a total of 117.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Results in Physics usually cover Materials Chemistry (1.7k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.7k papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (842 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (747 papers) and Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (698 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Results in Physics are Tasawar Hayat, Aly R. Seadawy, Ji‐Huan He, Ahmed Alsaedi, S. Nadeem, Dianchen Lu, Mostafa M. A. Khater, Masood Khan, M. Ijaz Khan and M.Y. Malik.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Results in Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Results in Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Results in Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Results in Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Results in Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Results in Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Results in Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025