International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
About
In The Last Decade
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
1.1k papers receiving 16.7k citations
Fields of papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being.
Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being more than expected).
- Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2006)
- The essence of essences – the search for meaning structures in phenomenological analysis of lifeworld phenomena (2006)
- Support through patient internet-communities: Lived experience of Russian in vitro fertilization patients (2011)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.