Psychological Research

3.1k papers and 68.1k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Psychological Research in the last decades have received a total of 68.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychological Research usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (2.2k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (909 papers) and Social Psychology (804 papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (959 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (612 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (459 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychological Research are Bernhard Hommel, Colwyn Trevarthen, Herbert Heuer, Nachshon Meiran, Johannes Engelkamp, Richard Ridderinkhof, Margaret J. Snowling, Donald T. Stuss, Iring Koch and Robert W. Proctor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychological Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychological Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychological Research.

Countries where authors publish in Psychological Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychological Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychological Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026