ESAIM Probability and Statistics

541 papers and 5.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 541 papers published in ESAIM Probability and Statistics in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in ESAIM Probability and Statistics usually cover Statistics and Probability (256 papers), Finance (200 papers) and Mathematical Physics (196 papers) specifically the topics of Stochastic processes and financial applications (160 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (148 papers) and Statistical Methods and Inference (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ESAIM Probability and Statistics are Michel Ledoux, Jean Jacod, Arnaud Gloter, Marc Lavielle, Estelle Kuhn, Yannick Baraud, Olivier Bousquet, Gábor Lugosi, Stéphane Boucheron and Élisabeth Gassiat.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ESAIM Probability and Statistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ESAIM Probability and Statistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ESAIM Probability and Statistics.

Countries where authors publish in ESAIM Probability and Statistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ESAIM Probability and Statistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ESAIM Probability and Statistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ESAIM Probability and Statistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025