Progress in Pediatric Cardiology

1.1k papers and 6.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Progress in Pediatric Cardiology in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Pediatric Cardiology usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (545 papers), Epidemiology (469 papers) and Surgery (392 papers) specifically the topics of Congenital Heart Disease Studies (436 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (141 papers) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Pediatric Cardiology are Steven E. Lipshultz, Jonathan J. Rome, Paul Barach, Gerald F. Cox, Robert J. Shprintzen, Karen Uzark, Patrick O’Leary, Jane W. Newburger, Steven D. Colan and Adolfo Correa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Pediatric Cardiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Pediatric Cardiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Pediatric Cardiology.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Pediatric Cardiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Pediatric Cardiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Pediatric Cardiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Pediatric Cardiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025