Poverty & Public Policy

285 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 285 papers published in Poverty & Public Policy in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Poverty & Public Policy usually cover Sociology and Political Science (141 papers), Economics and Econometrics (72 papers) and Safety Research (66 papers) specifically the topics of Income, Poverty, and Inequality (85 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (60 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Poverty & Public Policy are Diana Hernández, Stephen Bird, Max J. Skidmore, Stephen Devereux, Philip White, Ian Down, Amy L. Atchison, Pravin Jadhav, Björn Gustafsson and Quheng Deng.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Poverty & Public Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Poverty & Public Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Poverty & Public Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Poverty & Public Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Poverty & Public Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Poverty & Public Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Poverty & Public Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025