Popular Communication

419 papers and 3.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 419 papers published in Popular Communication in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Popular Communication usually cover Sociology and Political Science (169 papers), Communication (140 papers) and Gender Studies (125 papers) specifically the topics of Media Studies and Communication (101 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (87 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Popular Communication are Matt Hills, Sonia Livingstone, Alicia Blum‐Ross, Lilie Chouliaraki, Roberta Pearson, Myria Georgiou, Sarita Malik, Herman Wasserman, Benjamin Burroughs and Christian Christensen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Popular Communication

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Popular Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Popular Communication.

Countries where authors publish in Popular Communication

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Popular Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Popular Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Popular Communication more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025